4.7 Article

Mxene/carbon nanohorn/β-cyclodextrin-Metal-organic frameworks as high-performance electrochemical sensing platform for sensitive detection of carbendazim pesticide

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 396, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122776

关键词

MXene/CNHs; beta-CD-MOFs; Nanoarchitecture; Electrochemical sensor; Carbendazim pesticide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21665010, 51862014, 31741103, 21563014, 51302117]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20192BBEL50029]
  3. Provincial Projects for Postgraduate Innovation in Jiangxi [YC2019S182]
  4. National College Students' innovation and entrepreneurship training program [201810410013]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Nanchang City [2018CXTD014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pesticides play an important role in agricultural fields, but the pesticide residues pose strong hazardous to human health, thus designing sensitive and fast method for pesticides monitor is highly urgent. Herein, nanoarchitecture of Mxene/carbon nanohorns/beta-cyclodextrin-Metal-organic frameworks (MXene/CNHs/beta-CD-MOFs) was exploited as electrochemical sensing platform for carbendazim (CBZ) pesticide determination. beta-CD-MOFs combined the properties of host-guest recognition off beta-CD and porous structure, high porosity and pore volume of MOFs, enabling high adsorption capacity for CBZ. MXene/CNHs possessed large specific surface area, plenty of available active sites, high conductivity, which afforded more mass transport channels and enhances the mass transfer capacity and catalysis for CBZ. With the synergistic effect of MXene/CNHs and beta-CD-MOFs, the MXene/CNHs/beta-CD-MOFs electrode extended a wide linear range from 3.0 nM to 10.0 p.M and a low limit of detection (LOD) of 1.0 nM (S/N = 3). Additionally, the prepared sensor also demonstrated high selectivity, reproducibility and long-term stability, and satisfactory applicability in tomato samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据