4.7 Article

Facile one-step synthesis of 3D hierarchical flower-like magnesium peroxide for efficient and fast removal of tetracycline from aqueous solution

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 397, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122877

关键词

Flower-like MgO2; One-step synthesis; Tetracycline; Fast removal; Hydroxyl radical

资金

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51725504]
  2. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams of Chinese Academy of Sciences [2015HSC-UE004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hierarchically three dimensional (3D) flower-like magnesium peroxide (MgO2) nanostructures were synthesized through a facile one-step precipitation method. The effects of magnesium salt, reaction temperature, precipitant and surfactant on the morphology and structure of MgO2 were systematically investigated. The as-obtained samples using magnesium sulfate, ammonia and trisodium citrate were composed of 3D flowers assembled by numerous nanosheets, and SO42- played a vital role in the formation of flower-like nanostructures. The 3D flower-like MgO2 possessed high active oxygen content of 24.10 wt% and large specific surface area of 385 m(2)/g. Ten mg of flower-like MgO2 could efficiently degrade 90 % of tetracycline (TC) within 60 min under stirring condition. ESR tests and radical quenching experiments suggested that hydroxyl radicals were crucial for TC degradation. Moreover, the column filled with flower-like MgO2 could quickly and efficiently eliminate TC with the assistance of air flow, and the degradation efficiency almost had no decrease even after twenty consecutive runs. Significantly, the concentrations of magnesium and iron ions dissolved in the filtrate from the column were far below the limits of drinking water standards. Additionally, the possible degradation pathways of TC were also proposed according to the determination of generated intermediates during the degradation process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据