4.4 Article

Predicting the recombination potential of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
卷 101, 期 12, 页码 1251-1260

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.001491

关键词

coronavirus; SARS-CoV-2; MERS-CoV; recombination; emergence; predictions

资金

  1. COVID-19 priority grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology through the Genomics and Gene Regulation Unit
  4. Canada Research Chairs Programme
  5. Ontario Early Career Researcher Award
  6. CIHR COVID-19 rapid response grant
  7. CIHR New Investigator Award
  8. Ontario Early Researcher Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) recently emerged to cause widespread infections in humans. SARS-CoV-2 infections have been reported in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) causes seasonal outbreaks with a case fatality rate of -37%. Here we show that there exists a theoretical possibility of future recombination events between SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV RNA. Through computational analyses, we have identified homologous genomic regions within the ORFlab and S genes that could facilitate recombination, and have analysed co-expression patterns of the cellular receptors for SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV, ACE2 and DPP4, respectively, to identify human anatomical sites that could facilitate co-infection. Furthermore, we have investigated the likely susceptibility of various animal species to MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection by comparing known virus spike protein-receptor interacting residues. In conclusion, we suggest that a recombination between SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV RNA is possible and urge public health laboratories in high-risk areas to develop diagnostic capability for the detection of recombined coronaviruses in patient samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据