4.5 Article

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Detection of Colon Polyps: a Prospective, Randomized Cohort Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 2011-2018

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04802-4

关键词

Colonoscopy; Artificial intelligence; Computer-aided diagnose

资金

  1. Guangdong Gastrointestinal Disease Research Center [2017B020209003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined whether a high-performance, real-time automatic polyp detection system could improve the polyp detection rate in the actual clinical setting. Results showed that the AI system significantly increased the PDR and detection of smaller polyps, indicating potential for improving early detection of colorectal cancer. However, further research with a larger sample size is needed to confirm these findings.
Background and aims Improving the rate of polyp detection is an important measure to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC). Real-time automatic polyp detection systems, through deep learning methods, can learn and perform specific endoscopic tasks previously performed by endoscopists. The purpose of this study was to explore whether a high-performance, real-time automatic polyp detection system could improve the polyp detection rate (PDR) in the actual clinical environment. Methods The selected patients underwent same-day, back-to-back colonoscopies in a random order, with either traditional colonoscopy or artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy performed first by different experienced endoscopists (> 3000 colonoscopies). The primary outcome was the PDR. It was registered with. (NCT047126265). Results In this study, we randomized 150 patients. The AI system significantly increased the PDR (34.0% vs 38.7%,p< 0.001). In addition, AI-assisted colonoscopy increased the detection of polyps smaller than 6 mm (69 vs 91,p< 0.001), but no difference was found with regard to larger lesions. Conclusions A real-time automatic polyp detection system can increase the PDR, primarily for diminutive polyps. However, a larger sample size is still needed in the follow-up study to further verify this conclusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据