4.6 Article

Enhancing oxidative stability of sunflower oil by supplementation with prickled broom (Pterospartum tridentatum) ethanolic extract

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 85, 期 9, 页码 2812-2821

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.15378

关键词

Natural antioxidants; Pterospartum tridentatum; shelf-life; sunflower oil; thermal stability

资金

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [UID/MAR/04292/2019, UID/AGR/04129/2019]
  2. Centro 2020 program, Portugal 2020, European Union, through the European Regional Development Fund [Centro-01-0145-FEDER-000018]
  3. Fundo Azul program through the Direcao- Geral de Politica do Mar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ethanolic extract ofPterospartum tridentatumflowers in the stability of sunflower oil. The extract was characterized regarding to its antioxidant activity by the 2,2,1-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging method (EC50= 76.3 +/- 2.6 mu g/mL) and total phenolic content (200 +/- 8 mg GAE/g). Extracts were added at 500 mg/L (E1) and 1,000 mg/L (E2), and after 30 days of storage at room temperature, E2 oil showed improved quality parameters, with a reduction of 22.4%, 17.2%, and 45.6% in the values of acidity, peroxide, andp-anisidine, respectively. The extract also increased oil stability at 180 degrees C. After 27 hr, the acidity (0.216 +/- 0.016 mg KOH/g) and the total oxidation value (TOTOX) (69.30 +/- 0.26) values of E2 oil were significantly lower than the control. These results showed thatP. tridentatumeffectively improved the shelf-life and thermal stability of sunflower oil, being a promising source of antioxidants for edible oils processing. Practical Application Pterospartum tridentatumethanolic extracts increased stability of sunflower oil during storage at room temperature and at 180 degrees C. Oil stability increased with extract concentration, being highest for 1,000 mg/L. Therefore,P. tridentatummay be a promising source of antioxidants for edible oils processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据