4.7 Article

Microbial community in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor and its performance in treating organic solid waste under controlled and deteriorated conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 269, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110786

关键词

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor; Organic solid waste treatment; Overloading; Deteriorated conditions; Microbial community structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adoption of anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) for organic solid waste management is important for the recovery of energy and high-quality treated water. However, few studies have focused on AnMBR treatment of high-strength organic solid waste and the microorganisms involved under deteriorated operating conditions. In the present study, a 15-L bench-scale AnMBR was operated using a model slurry of high-strength organic solid waste with the organic loading rate (OLR) increasing from 2.3 g chemical oxygen demand (COD) L-1 day(-1) (represented as a controlled condition) to 11.6 g COD L-1 day(-1) (represented as a deteriorated condition), and microbial community dynamics over 120 days of operation were analyzed. The abundances of methanogens and bacteria that were dominant under the controlled condition decreased as a result of both high organic loading and sludge withdrawal under the deteriorated condition and did not recover thereafter. Instead, numbers of putative volatile fatty acid (VFA)-producing bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) related to the genus Prevotella increased rapidly, reaching a relative abundance of 43.2%, leading to the deterioration of methanogenic AnMBR operation. Considering that the sequences of these OTUs exhibited relatively low sequence identity (91-95%) to those of identified Prevotella species, the results strongly suggest that the accumulation of VFAs by novel VFA-producing bacteria in the digestion sludge promotes the disruption of the methanogen community under deteriorated conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据