4.7 Article

Long term permeation properties of different fly ash geopolymer concretes

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 352-362

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.121

关键词

Geopolymer; Water absorption; Permeability; Chloride diffusion; Durability

资金

  1. School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Geopolymer is a sustainable construction material produced by the activation of fly ash using a high concentration alkali to initiate a polymerisation reaction. A key parameter in determining the potential adoption of geopolymer concrete in the construction industry is the long term durability of the material. To determine the durability characteristics a detailed investigation of the permeation properties of four different fly ash geopolymer concretes was carried out up to one year of age. An improvement in the durability properties is observed for all geopolymer concretes with time. This is attributed to an ongoing geopolymerization which results in continuing gel formation leading to a more densely packed microstructure, with an associated reduction in meso-pores and macro-pores. The packing density coupled, with the pore size distribution, were observed to determine the permeation and diffusion characteristics of the concrete. The increased in meso-pores represents the increase in the gel of the matrix and in turn this affect the increase of water absorption. On the other hand, a high quantity of macro-pores leads to an increase in the water and air permeability of geopolymer concrete. A large quantity of coarse particles in fly ash results in an uneven gel distribution which reduces pore-filling ability, while the presence of a high quantity of CaO was observed to contribute to a densely packed microstructure. Notably the initial chloride diffusion coefficients are analogous to those observed in Portland and blended cement concretes and also decrease with the age in a similar manher. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据