4.3 Article

Performance of acid mine drainage sludge as an innovative catalytic oxidation source for treating vehicle-washing wastewater

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2020.1813592

关键词

Car wash; Fenton; acid mine drainage; kinetics; thermodynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduced the use of iron sludge recovered from acid mine drainage (AMD) waste, as advanced oxidation processes, for treating vehicle-washing wastewater using AMD/H2O2 (Fenton's reagent). The optimized system variables in this study achieved a high predicted organics removal rate, showcasing the effectiveness of using iron from waste effluents for wastewater treatment.
This study introduces iron sludge recovered from acid mine drainage (AMD) waste, as advanced oxidation processes, that is, AMD/H2O2(Fenton's reagent) to treat vehicle-washing wastewater. Vehicle-washing wastewater was collected from car washing facility in West Virginia, USA, and subjected for laboratory-scale batch experiments. Response surface methodological analysis was chosen to optimize the parametric conditions of the Fenton's system. A 15-level of quadratic Box-Behnken design model was applied via response surface methodology to evaluate the effects and interactions of the system variables. The optimized system variables were attained at pH 4.0 using 92 and 354 mg/L of AMD and H(2)O(2)concentrations, respectively, to achieve the maximum predicted organics removals of 91.4%. Analysis of variance, which was applied for statistical data analysis, showed the significant of the quadratic models for treatment. The linear correlation between the total organic carbon (TOC) and chemical oxygen demand (COD), with sufficient accuracy, is providing the possibility of estimating COD from TOC values. Finally, the results showed that the reaction is endothermic, non-spontaneous in nature and follows the second-order reaction kinetics rate. The results of this work signify the importance of using iron from waste effluents for treating wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据