4.5 Article

Esophageal balloon calibration during Sigh: A physiologic, randomized, cross-over study

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 125-132

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.10.021

关键词

Respiratory mechanics; Artificial respiration; Manometry; Artefacts

资金

  1. Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carita, Novara, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated and compared the optimal esophageal balloon filling volume during Sigh breath, volume controlled ventilation (VCV), and pressure support ventilation (PSV). It was found that a higher filling volume was required during Sigh breath for accurate measurement of tidal changes in esophageal pressure (Pes). This highlights the importance of adjusting esophageal balloon filling volume based on the ventilation mode and intrathoracic pressure for accurate Pes assessment.
Purpose: Optimal esophageal balloon filling volume (V-best) depends on the intrathoracic pressure. During Sigh breath delivered by the ventilator machine, esophageal balloon is surrounded by elevated intrathoracic pressure that might require higher filling volume for accurate measure of tidal changes in esophageal pressure (Pes). The primary aim of our investigation was to evaluate and compare V-best during volume controlled and pressure support breaths vs. Sigh breath. Materials and methods: Twenty adult patients requiring invasive volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure were enrolled. After the insertion of a naso-gastric catheter equipped with 10 ml esophageal balloon, each patient underwent three 30-min trials as follows: VCV, pressure support ventilation (PSV), and PSV + Sigh. Sigh was added to PSV as 35 cmH(2)O pressure-controlled breath over 4 s, once per minute. PSV and PSV + Sigh were randomly applied and, at the end of each step, esophageal balloon calibration was performed. Results: Vbest was higher for Sigh breath (4.5 [3.0-6.8] ml) compared to VCV (1.5 [1.0-2.9] ml, P = 0.0004) and PSV tidal breath (1.0 [0.5-2.4] ml, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: During Sigh breath, applying a calibrated approach for Pes assessment, a higher Vbest was required compared to VCV and PSV tidal breath. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据