4.7 Article

Nickel and cobalt metal-organic-frameworks-derived hollow microspheres porous carbon assembled from nanorods and nanospheres for outstanding supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 575, 期 -, 页码 96-107

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.04.083

关键词

MOF; Asymmetric Supercapacitor; Cobalt-nickel oxide; Porous carbon; Hollow microsphere

资金

  1. Heilongjiang Natural Science Foundation [B2017011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of efficient electrode materials is essential to promote the performance of energy storage equipment. Nowadays, metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have been widely regarded as active materials for supercapacitors mainly thanks to their adjustable structure and outstanding porosity. Here, highly optimized Nickel and Cobalt MOF-derived N-doped porous carbon (Ni/Co-MOF-NPC) are considered the best choice for electrode materials due to their unique structural properties and excellent electrochemical performance. Pure cobalt oxide rarely reaches a specific capacitance of 104.3 F g(-1) when the current density is 1 A g(-1), but the optimized Ni/Co-MOF-NPC-2:1 offers an ultra-high specific capacitance of 1214 F g(-1), which is much higher than that of pure cobalt oxide in a three-electrode test system. When the current density is 10 A g(-1), after 6000 cycles, the capacitance can still maintain 98.8% of the initial capacitance. Asymmetric supercapacitors were assembled using the prepared Ni/Co-MOF-NPC-2:1 as the positive electrode material, corrugated paper activated carbon (CPAC) as the negative electrode material, the prepared Ni/Co-MOF-NPC-2:1//CPAC exhibits an outstanding energy density of 55.4 Wh kg(-1) at 758.5 W kg(-1), and has a significant cycle stability of 75.2% retention after 20,000 cycles. This excellent MOF synthesis strategy reduced the gap between the experimental synthesis and practical application of MOF in fast energy storage. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据