4.7 Article

Impact of added water and superplasticizer on early compressive strength of selected mixtures of palm oil fuel ash-based engineered geopolymer composites

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 198-206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.033

关键词

POFA; Alkaline-activated binder; Engineered geopolymer composites; Water; Superplasticizer

资金

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia through Research University Grant [1001/PAWAM/814191]
  2. Center of Engineering Research (CER) of Research Institute, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates and presents a study on the comparative effects of added water and naphthalene based superplasticizer (SP) on the compressive strength and microstructure of the developed palm oil fuel ash engineered geopolymer composites (POFA-EGC). Three differently prepared 50 mm x 50 mm x 50 mm specimens (with 10% water, with 10% SP and with 5% SP & 5% water) were used to study the synthesis of POFA and alkali-activating solutions (8 M NaOH(aq) + Na2SiO3 [Ms = 3.3]). 2% volume fraction of PVA fibres were added to engineer the cementitious composite mixture. All the specimens were cured in an oven for 24 h at 60 +/- 5 degrees C to accelerate the geopolymer reaction process to generate the binder. After testing, the obtained results showed that while specimens with added water only gave the compressive strength of 29.4 MPa, there was a 19% decrease in compressive strength for samples with SP only at 28 days. The specimens with water and SP combined have the least strength. Microstructural examinations (SEM) and material characterization (XRD, FTIR) of the alkali-activated composite also revealed the superior performance of the specimens with water over SP. The significant finding of this research work is the better performance of POFA-EGC prepared with only water in both fresh and hardened states. It is recommended that water be given precedence over SP in the development of POFA-EGC. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据