4.7 Article

Impact resistance of a sustainable Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC) under pendulum impact loadings

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 203-215

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.157

关键词

Impact resistance; Sustainable; Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced; Concrete (UHPFRC); Pendulum impact; Energy dissipation

资金

  1. Graniet-Import Benelux
  2. Kijlstra Betonmortel
  3. Struyk Verwo
  4. Attero
  5. ENCI HeidelbergCement
  6. Provincie Overijssel
  7. Rijkswaterstaat Zee en Delta - District Noord
  8. Van Gansewinkel Minerals
  9. BTE
  10. V.d. Bosch Beton
  11. Selor
  12. Twee R Recycling
  13. GMB
  14. Schenk Concrete Consultancy
  15. Geochem Research
  16. Icopal
  17. BN International
  18. Eltomation
  19. Knauf Gips
  20. Hess ACC Systems
  21. Kronos
  22. Joma
  23. CRH Europe Sustainable Concrete Centre
  24. CementBetonCentrum
  25. Heros
  26. Inashco

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the impact resistance of a sustainable UHPFRC member under pendulum impact loadings. The modified Andreasen and Andersen model is employed for the concrete matrix design, and two pendulum impact set-ups are utilized in the experiments: Charpy Impact Device and Modified Pendulum Impact Device. For the Charpy impact test, the obtained results show that the fibre length plays a dominating role in improving the energy dissipation capacity of the sustainable UHPFRC. With a constant total steel fibre amount, a higher proportion of short straight fibres decrease the energy absorption capacity of the concrete sample. However, the results obtained from the Modified Pendulum Impact Device demonstrate that, compared to the concrete with single sized fibres, the addition of hybrid steel fibres is more beneficial for improving the energy dissipation capacity of the sustainable UHPFRC under pendulum impact. Subsequently, the inconsistent results obtained from both investigated test methods are analysed and discussed. Based on the obtained experimental results, it can be concluded that there is an urgent need for a systematic standard for evaluating the impact resistance of UHPFRC. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据