4.3 Article

Dilemma in Parkinson's Treatment; Levodopa Monotherapy May be the Best Choice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 219-223

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.06.024

关键词

Parkinson; Levodopa; Pramipexole; Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS); Psychosis; Hallucination; HRQoL

资金

  1. Vice Chancellor for Research & Technology of Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran-Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Several treatment strategies have been claimed for Parkinson's disease (PD) so far. However, there remains controversies over the best possible treatment. The aim of this study is to compare Levodopa monotherapy versus Pramipexole in combination with Levodopa L in patients with PD with regards to the efficacy and side effects. Methods: Patients being treated with levodopa alone and Pramipexole add-on therapy to Levodopa were enrolled in the study. Factors regarding efficacy and side effects were assessed and analyzed between both groups by appropriate tests. Results: 176 Patients were enrolled in the study. Results showed significant higher total MDS-UPDRS (worse total disease severity score) among patients being treated with Pramipexole add-on therapy which was particularly higher in parts 1 (Mentation, behavior and mood), 2 (Activity of daily living) and 3 (Motor examination) (P-values < 0.05). Psychosis global score with significantly higher frequency of hallucination and depression, statistically higher in combination therapy group compared to Levodopa monotherapy group (P-value < 0.05). Patients in the Pramipexole add-on group reported lower scores of Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (P-value < 0.05). Significant correlation was between disease duration and psychosis score among Levodopa monotherapy group (P-value < 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to Levodopa monotherapy, Add-on therapy with Pramipexole shows less efficiency yet more side effects. This indicates that single administration of Levodopa still remains the best available treatment for Parkinson's disease. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据