4.7 Article

Metagenomic Sequencing To Detect Respiratory Viruses in Persons under Investigation for COVID-19

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02142-20

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; metagenomic sequencing; diagnostics; respiratory viruses

资金

  1. Pediatric Research Alliance Center for Childhood Infections and Vaccines
  2. NIH [P51 OD011132, S10 OD026799, K08 AI13948]
  3. Center for AIDS Research [P30 AI050409]
  4. Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our study found that current broad-spectrum molecular testing algorithms can identify most respiratory viral infections among SARS-CoV-2 PUIs when available and implemented consistently.
Broad testing for respiratory viruses among persons under investigation (PUIs) for SARS-CoV-2 has been performed inconsistently, limiting our understanding of alternative viral infections and coinfections in these patients. RNA metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) offers an agnostic tool for the detection of both SARS-CoV-2 and other RNA respiratory viruses in PUls. Here, we used RNA mNGS to assess the frequencies of alternative viral infections in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-negative PUls (n = 30) and viral coinfections in SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive PUls (n = 45). mNGS identified all viruses detected by routine clinical testing (influenza A En = 3], human metapneumovirus [n = 2], and human coronavirus OC43 = 2], and human coronavirus HKU1 [n = 1]). mNGS also identified both coinfections (1, 2.2%) and alternative viral infections (4, 13.3%) that were not detected by routine clinical workup (respiratory syncytial virus [n = 3], human metapneumovirus [n = 1], and human coronavirus NL63 [n = 1]). Among SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive PUls, lower cycle threshold (C-T) values correlated with greater SARS-CoV-2 read recovery by mNGS (R-2, 0.65; P < 0.001). Our results suggest that current broad-spectrum molecular testing algorithms identify most respiratory viral infections among SARS-CoV-2 PUIs, when available and implemented consistently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据