4.5 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Long non-coding RNA XIST binding to let-7c-5p contributes to rheumatoid arthritis through its effects on proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts via regulation of STAT3 (Retracted article. See vol. 36, 2022)

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23496

关键词

Let-7c-5p; long non-coding RNA X-inactive specific transcript; osteoblast; rheumatoid arthritis; signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

资金

  1. National Youth Science Foundation of China [80151459]
  2. Education Department of Jilin Province 13th Five-Year Science and Technology Research Project (2016) [467]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune disease, affects around 1% population worldwide, with the life quality of patients severely reduced. In this study, it is intended to explore the role of long non-coding RNA X-inactive specific transcript (lncRNA XIST) in RA and the underlying mechanisms associated with let-7c-5p and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). Methods LncRNA XIST, let-7c-5p, and STAT3 expressions were determined in RA and normal cartilage tissues, and their relationship was analyzed in osteoblasts. The regulatory effects of lncRNA XIST in RA were investigated when XIST expression was upregulated or downregulated in osteoblasts. TNF-alpha, IL-2, IL-6, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin, TGF-beta 1, and IGF1 were measured in vivo in RA rats. Results LncRNA XIST and STAT3 were expressed at high levels and let-7c-5p expressed at a low level in RA cartilage tissues. LncRNA XIST silencing or let-7c-5p enhancement led to decreased levels of TNF-alpha, IL-2, and IL-6, suggestive of suppressed inflammatory response, and increased levels of ALP, osteocalcin, TGF-beta 1, and IGF-1 as well as reduced damage in cartilage tissues. Conclusion LncRNA XIST downregulation could promote proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts in RA, serving as a future therapeutic target for RA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据