4.8 Article

p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase regulates chamber-specific perinatal growth in heart

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 130, 期 10, 页码 5287-5301

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI135859

关键词

-

资金

  1. US NIH [HL070079, HL103205, HL108186, HL110667]
  2. DoD/DOD/DHP PRMRP-IIRA [PR171540]
  3. Construction of Lab-exchange Type Health & Biomedical Science Research Consortium, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the mammalian heart, the left ventricle (LV) rapidly becomes more dominant in size and function over the right ventricle (RV) after birth. The molecular regulators responsible for this chamber-specific differential growth are largely unknown. We found that cardiomyocytes in the neonatal mouse RV had lower proliferation, more apoptosis, and a smaller average size compared with the LV. This chamber-specific growth pattern was associated with a selective activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity in the RV and simultaneous inactivation in the LV. Cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of both the Mapk74 and Maphil genes in mice resulted in loss of p38 MAPK expression and activity in the neonatal heart. Inactivation of p38 activity led to a marked increase in cardiomyocyte proliferation and hypertrophy but diminished cardiomyocyte apoptosis, specifically in the RV. Consequently, the p38-inactivated hearts showed RV-specific enlargement postnatally, progressing to pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure at the adult stage. Chamber-specific p38 activity was associated with differential expression of dual-specific phosphatases (DUSP5) in neonatal hearts, including DUSP26. Unbiased transcriptome analysis revealed that IRE1 alpha/X8P1-mediated gene regulation contributed to p38 MAPK-dependent regulation of neonatal cardiomyocyte proliferation and binucleation. These findings establish an obligatory role of DUSP/p38/IRE1 alpha signaling in cardiomyocytes for chamber-specific growth in the postnatal heart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据