4.7 Article

A comparative study on geopolymers synthesized by different classes of fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122500

关键词

Coal fly ash; Geopolymer; Thermal-mechanical behavior; Elevated temperatures; Fire-resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to more restrictions in disposal regulations, limited accessibility of landfills, and growing disposal costs, more sustainable methods are needed to recycle coal fly ash. Coal fly ash-based geopolymer is regarded as an environmental-friendly alternative cementitious material to ordinary Portland cement for its sustainable characteristics such as less CO2 emissions, less energy consumption, and less leaching of toxic elements. Mechanical properties and fire-resistance of geopolymer concrete have been investigated in previous studies. However, there lacks a systematic study on the thermal-mechanical behaviors of geopolymer derived from different classes of fly ash after exposure to high temperature (>800 degrees C). This study presents a detailed comparative study concerning the effect of elevated temperatures (up to 1200 degrees C) on Class C and Class F fly ash-based geopolymer pastes. The thermo-physical behavior, engineering performance, and microstructures of the geopolymers before and after the exposure have been investigated. In addition, sustainability analysis of the raw materials and geopolymer was also presented in this study. The findings demonstrate that Class F fly ash-based geopolymer pastes have better mechanical properties and thermo-physical performance when the heating temperature is below 500 degrees C. On the other hand, Class C fly ash-based geopolymer specimens have better thermal performance and higher retention ratio of strengths after being exposed to higher temperatures (>800 degrees C). The results can provide more detailed guidance for engineers to sustainably use the fly-ash based geopolymer in different specific temperature ranges. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据