4.7 Article

Multi-objective optimization for the deployment of carbon capture utilization and storage supply chain considering economic and environmental performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122481

关键词

Carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS); Superstructure; Life cycle assessment mixed integer linear programming (MILP); Multi-objective optimization

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21878034, 21776035]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of China [DUT18LAB11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) is widely recognized as a promising mitigation technology that would significantly reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emission. This study develops an optimization-based framework for the deployment of CCUS supply chain with economic and environmental concerns. The overall supply chain is optimized based on superstructure method over a 20 years' time horizon to provide the location and scale of capture and sequestration sites as well as the most efficient CO2 transport routes capable of meeting the reduction target. The resulting problem is a multi-objective mixed integer linear programming (MILP) problem, whose objectives include minimizing total annual cost and environmental impact. The environmental impact is measured by Global Warming Potential (GWP) imposed by the supply chain operation and quantified according to the principles of Life cycle assessment (LCA). epsilon-Constraint method is implemented to solve the resultant multi-objective model. A realistic case study that addresses the optimal design of the CCUS supply chain needed to meet the reduction target in Northeast China is studied to demonstrate the application of the proposed model. Results obtained provides valuable insights into the addressed problem and guides the decision-maker to adopt more sustainable alternatives in the deployment of CCUS. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据