4.7 Review

Analysis of fuzzy applications in the agri-supply chain: A literature review

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124577

关键词

Agriculture; Agri-supply chain issues; Fuzzy logic; Systematic literature review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the application of fuzzy logic in the agri-supply chain by considering factors such as land suitability, production techniques, irrigation, and transportation, and establishes an integrated framework. It points out the lack of efficient knowledge-based models in the field at present.
With the increasing global demand for fresh food, the importance of the mass agri-producing countries has also increased. Agri-production has undergone a significant transformation from traditional practices to precise practices with the help of new technologies such as the IoT, big data, and GIS. However, the impact of such precision on the overall supply chain is insufficient due to the low adaptability of these expensive technologies. Fuzzy logic, known for being able to handle uncertainty in different fields of science and technology, may be able to address the highly uncertain factors of the agri-supply chain, such as the soil content, rainfall, humidity, and production and yield prediction. Thus, this study reviews fuzzy applications in the agri-supply chain considering land suitability, production techniques, irrigation, cold storage deficiencies, transportation, waste management, environmental and sustainability issues, and drought management and establishes an integrated framework. The integrated framework, which aims to analyse the overall supply chain performance, finally concludes that there is a lack of efficient knowledge-based models in the domain. Thus, using collaborative fuzzy applications with big data and GIS with a higher degree of heuristic and meta-heuristic simulations in the agri-supply chain can develop more robust models. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据