4.7 Article

Effectiveness evaluation of photovoltaic poverty alleviation project in China: From a capital perspective

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 284, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124684

关键词

Photovoltaic; Poverty alleviation; Capital; Effectiveness evaluation; Mode

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photovoltaic poverty alleviation project (PPAP) has gained attention in China for integrating solar photovoltaics and poverty alleviation. Among the four different modes, village level and jointly-village level PPAP are the most effective, with bank loans playing a significant role in increasing the number of benefited households. The beneficiary ratio is critical to the effectiveness of corporations' participation.
The photovoltaic poverty alleviation project (PPAP), as an integration of solar photovoltaics and poverty alleviation, has gained great attention since it was proposed in China. So far, four different modes of PPAP have been - formed household level, village level, jointly-village level, and centralized PPAP. A comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of different PPAP modes is essential to achieve the aim of getting rid of poverty in Chinese rural areas and to provide references for other developing countries. Therefore, this paper, for the first time, evaluates the economic performance of PPAP under the four modes. By employing cost-benefit analysis, this research elaborates on the effectiveness of PPAP from three aspects - cashflow, net present value, and payback period. The results show that the village level and the jointly-village level PPAP are the most effective modes. However, due to the overplus of installed capacity per household, the centralized PPAP, which is in line with the local governments' income, becomes the most popular mode. Besides, bank loans can significantly increase the number of benefited households, and the beneficiary ratio is critical to the effectiveness of corporations' participation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据