4.6 Article

Single isomer cyclodextrins as chiral selectors in capillary electrophoresis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1627, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461375

关键词

Capillary electrophoresis; Synthesis of single isomer cyclodextrin derivatives; Chiral separation; Enantiomer migration order; Enantiorecognition; Supramolecular interactions

资金

  1. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  2. Bolyai+ New National Excellence Program [UNKP19-4-SE-53]
  3. Ministry of Human Capacities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since decades, cyclodextrins are one of the most powerful selectors in chiral capillary electrophoresis for the enantioseparation of diverse organic compounds. This review concerns papers published over the last decade (from 2009 until nowadays), dealing with the capillary electrophoretic application of single isomer cyclodextrin derivatives in chiral separations. Following a brief overview of their synthetic approaches, the inventory of the neutral, negatively and positively charged (including both permanently ionic and pH-tunable ionizable substituents) and zwitterionic CD derivatives is presented, with insights to underlying structural aspects by NMR spectroscopy and molecular modeling. CE represents an ideal tool to study the weak, non-covalent supramolecular interactions. The published methods are reviewed in the light of enantioselectivity, enantiomer migration order and the fine-tuning of enantiodiscrimination by the substitution pattern of the single entity selector molecules, which is hardly possible for their randomly substituted counterparts. All the reviewed publications herein support that cyclodextrin-based chiral capillary electrophoresis seems to remain a popular choice in pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. (c) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据