4.5 Article

Synthesis, Characterization, and Property Investigation of a Metal- Organic Framework Encapsulated Polyoxometalate Guests: An Advanced Inorganic Chemistry Experiment

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
卷 97, 期 11, 页码 4152-4157

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00905

关键词

Upper-Division Undergraduate; Inorganic Chemistry; Hands-On Learning/Manipulatives; Inquiry-Based/Discovery Learning; Problem Solving/Decision Making; Coordination Compounds; Materials Science

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21231002, 21371029, 21671033, 91622108, 21872021]
  2. Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry (Jilin University) [2015-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A research-style laboratory experiment for advanced undergraduate students is described, which includes the synthesis, characterization, and properties (porosity, stability, amphipathy) testing of the composite [Cu-2(BTC)(4/3)(H2O)(2)](6)-[HPW12O40]center dot(C4H12N)(2)center dot 25H(2)O (denoted as NENU-3, H3BTC = 1,3,5-benzene-tricarboxylic acid). This experiment lets students experience the universal procedure of hydro(solvo)-thermal synthesis and get knowledge of general scientific research approaches as well as have hands-on experiences in diverse modern instrumental techniques (PXRD, IR and UV-vis spectroscopy, N-2 adsorption, and TG analysis) extensively used in chemical research. Most importantly, this laboratory experiment exposes students to explore the structure-property-application relationship in NENU-3 composite material through comparing the structure and properties of NENU-3 with those of its individual component materials (H3PW12O40 and Cu-3(BTC)(2)) and consulting the related literature about NENU-3 catalysis. This experiment is helpful for developing the scientific thinking of students in chemistry through completing the analysis and discussion about the structure-property-application relationship in POM@MOF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据