4.5 Article

Pasting, thermal and rheological properties of octenylsuccinylate modified starches from diverse small granule starches differing in amylose content

期刊

JOURNAL OF CEREAL SCIENCE
卷 95, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2020.103030

关键词

Small granule starch; OSA modification; Pasting property; Rheological property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671893, 81773064]
  2. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [18490741300, 18391900600]
  3. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Agri -X Fund [AgriX2016008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Waxy maize (a standard starch of normal granule size) and five small granule starches from different botanical sources (rice, wheat B type, oat, quinoa and amaranth) were subjected to 2-octenyl-1-succinic anhydride (OSA) modification. Changes of pasting, gel texture, thermal and rheological properties were investigated. Different small granule starches showed quite different property changes after OSA modification. Pasting viscosity was generally increased in OSA starches, among which OSA oat starch had notably high peak and breakdown viscosity but low setback viscosity. Gel hardness of rice, wheat B type, oat and quinoa starches was reduced by OSA treatment, whereas that of waxy maize and amaranth starches was increased. Amylose content was considered to be the major factor influencing pasting, gel and thermal property of OSA starches. Esterification increased pseudoplastic flow behavior of all starches, while OSA oat starch uniquely had reduced flow consistency coefficient. The dynamic rheological properties were also changed differentially among OSA starches. Viscoelastic properties of rice, wheat B type, oat and quinoa starches were increased after OSA treatment, whereas those of waxy maize and amaranth starches were decreased. This study showed that diverse functionalities from OSA small granule starches may fulfil different demands in product development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据