4.2 Review

Increasing cell density/decreasing cell size to produce microcellular and nanocellular thermoplastic foams: A review

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PLASTICS
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 769-797

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0021955X20959301

关键词

Polymeric foam; cell nucleation; processing methods; cell density; cell size

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymeric foams have attracted attention for their unique properties such as high strength to weight ratio, excellent thermal and sound insulation, and low cost. Researchers have shown that increasing cell density/decreasing cell size can achieve superior thermal insulation. The most efficient solutions include using nucleating agents, increasing blowing agent solubility, and using nanoparticles to achieve microcellular and nanocellular structures.
Nowadays, polymeric foams have attracted particular attention in scientific and industrial societies due to their unique properties, such as high strength to weight ratio, excellent thermal and sound insulation, and low cost. Researchers have shown that the extraordinary properties of polymeric foams such as superior thermal insulation, can be achieved by increasing the cell density/decreasing the cell size. In this regard, firstly, the most important foaming processes, i.e. batch, extrusion, and injection molding are studied in the present research. Then, cell nucleation stage as the most crucial phenomenon for achieving high cell density/small cell size is investigated in detail. In the next step, the most important researches in the field of polymeric foams are introduced in which the largest cell densities/smallest cell sizes have been achieved. The investigations show that the most remarkable results (highest cell densities/smallest cell sizes) belong to the batch process. Also, the use of nucleating agents, increasing the solubility of blowing agent into the polymer, and the use of nanoparticles are the most efficient solutions to achieve microcellular and nanocellular structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据