4.8 Article

Enhancement of light olefin production in CO2 hydrogenation over In2O3-based oxide and SAPO-34 composite

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 391, 期 -, 页码 459-470

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.09.010

关键词

CO2 hydrogenation; Light olefins; Bifunctional catalyst; InCeOx; InCrOx; Reaction mechanism

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0604802]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21802157, 21875275, U1910203, 21991092, 21991090]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDA21020500]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province of China [201901D211581]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, CAS [2020BWZ004]
  6. excellent doctoral student award and subsidy program of Shanxi Province [BK2018001]
  7. East-West Cooperation Project of the Ningxia Key RD Plan [2017BY063]
  8. Innovative Talent Program of Shanxi Province [201605D211001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indium-based oxides are potential catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. However, upon complex-ing with SAPO-34, they give a C-2(=)-C-4(=) yield below 7.3% due to production of large amounts of CO and CH4 at high CO2 conversion. Therefore, a large improvement of the C-2(=)-C-4(=) yield over indium-based oxide and zeolite composites is a challenge. In this context, InCeOx and InCrOx oxides were prepared and found to produce more methanol than In2O3 or In-Zr oxide. Experimental and DFT calculation results reveal that incorporation of Ce or Cr into In2O3 generates more surface oxygen vacancies and enhances the electronic interaction between HCOO* intermediates and the catalyst surface, which decreases HCOO* and CH3OH formation free energy barriers and enthalpy barriers. Compared with InCeOx(0.13) and In2O3, InCrOx(0.13) shows higher catalytic activity for CO2 hydrogenation, and by coupling with SAPO-34, it gives a C-2(=)-C-4(=) yield of 1.5-2.0 times those obtained on In2O3/SAPO-34 and In-Zr/SAPO-34 at CO2 conversion of 33.6%. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据