4.3 Review

RANKL as a target for the treatment of osteoporosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 91-105

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00774-020-01153-7

关键词

Denosumab; Bone resorption; Bone turnover marker (BTM); Bone mineral density (BMD); Fracture

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoporosis is characterized by compromised bone strength, predisposing to an increased risk of fracture. Denosumab, as a treatment drug, reduces bone resorption by inhibiting the RANKL-RANK system, and has been widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis.
Osteoporosis is characterized by compromised bone strength, predisposing to an increased risk of fracture. Because bone is constantly remodeled, and bone mass and structure are determined by the balance between bone resorption and bone formation, it is important to maintain normal bone turnover. Therefore, therapies that reduce bone resorption have been the mainstream of osteoporosis treatment. Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-RANK signaling was found to play a pivotal role in the regulation of osteoclastic bone resorption, and inhibition of RANKL-RANK system has become an important therapeutic target for the treatment of osteoporosis. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-RANKL neutralizing antibody, is developed as a drug for the treatment of osteoporosis. This review summarized pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of denosumab, clinical studies including phase 2 dose-ranging and its extension study, phase 3 fracture prevention study (FREEDOM) with extension up to 10 years, studies on male osteoporosis (ADAMO study), and on glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, along with relevant clinical studies in Japan. In addition, mechanism of denosumab action that can explain its long-term sustained effects, combination and sequential treatment as well as the problems in discontinuation of denosumab, and finally safety of denosumab therapy is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据