4.4 Article

Bone morphogenetic proteins in biomineralization of two endodontic restorative cements

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34704

关键词

biocompatibility; biodentine; biomineralization; MTA

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq) [312209/2017-7]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior
  3. Fundacao Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experimental results demonstrate that Biodentine (BD) and MTA-Angelus (MTA) exhibit good biocompatibility and osteoinductive activity, but they have different effects on inflammatory mediators and gene expression, which may be related to their affinities with the substrate and dental substrates.
To assess the effect of biodentine (BD) and MTA-angelus (MTA) on biocompatibility, BMP2, BMP4, and osteocalcin (OC) expression. Subcutaneously implanted tubes of four groups (MTA, BD, Control, and Sham) were kept over 15, 30, and 60 days; histological analyses were performed using H&E and Von Kossa; ELISA quantified IL-1 beta and IL-8 expression; and qRT-PCR verified gene expression of BMPs and OC. Sham showed slight changes in profile/intensity of inflammatory infiltrate in all periods. Control had an inflammatory score significantly higher than Sham at 15 days (p < .05). BD revealed a similar inflammatory response to Sham, without significant changes over periods. MTA group exhibited an increase in chronic inflammatory profile at 30 days, with significant reduction at 60 days, when compared to Sham (p < .05). At 30/60 days, experimental groups presented birefringent areas. At 30/60 days, BD and MTA significantly increase IL-1 beta compared to Control, whereas an increase in IL-8 was observed only in BD. At 30/60 days, BD produces an expression of BMP2 whereas MTA influenced BMP4 and OC. Materials tested are biocompatible and they have osteoinductive activity; the materials influenced the expression of the tested mediators differently, suggesting different affinities with the substrate and the dental substrates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据