4.5 Article

Bone morphogenetic protein-2 delivery from polyelectrolyte multilayersenhances osteogenicactivity on nanostructured titania

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 109, 期 7, 页码 1173-1182

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37109

关键词

bone marrow stromal cells; bone morphogenetic protein-2; chitosan; heparin; titania nanotubes

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [5R01HL135505, 5R21HL139208]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that delivering BMP-2 from PEMs-modified Nt surfaces enhances osteogenic properties, promoting osteocalcin and calcium deposition. This sustained growth factor delivery strategy improves bone healing outcomes and reduces complications for recipients of orthopedic implants.
Incomplete osseointegration is primary cause of failure for orthopedic implants. New biomaterials that present stable signals promoting osteogenesis could reduce failure rates of orthopedic implants. In this study bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) was delivered from titania nanotubes (Nt) modified with chitosan/heparin polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs). The surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. BMP-2 release from the surfaces was measured in vitro for up to 28 days. After an initial burst release of BMP-2 during the first 2 days, most of the BMP-2 remained on the surface. To determine the osteogenic properties of these surfaces, they were seeded with rat bone marrow cells; alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, total protein, calcium deposition, and osteocalcin were measured up to 4 weeks in vitro. When compared to Nt surfaces, the surfaces with BMP-2 induce greater osteocalcin and calcium deposition. PEMs provide sustained presentation of BMP-2, from a biomimetic surface. This enhances the osteogenic properties of the surface without requiring supraphysiologic growth factor dose. This growth factor delivery strategy could be used to improve bone healing outcomes and reduce complications for recipients of orthopedic implants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据