4.5 Article

Gentamicin encapsulated within a biopolymer for the treatment ofStaphylococcus aureusandEscherichia coliinfected skin ulcers

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2020.1817667

关键词

Biomembrane; dressing; gentamicin; antimicrobial activity; hemolysis; Caenorhabditis elegans

资金

  1. FAPESP, Sao Paulo Research Foundation [2011/17411-8, 2014/17526-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to develop a GS release system using NRL as matrix for treatment of skin ulcers infected with Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, without altering the antibiotic properties of the drug.
Skin wound infection requires carefully long-term treatment with an immense financial burden to healthcare systems worldwide. Various strategies such as drug delivery systems using polymer matrix from natural source have been used to enhance wound healing. Natural rubber latex (NRL) fromHevea brasiliensishas shown angiogenic and tissue repair properties. Gentamicin sulfate (GS) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic which inhibits the growth of a wide variety of microorganisms and, because of this, it has also been applied topically for treatment of local infections. The aim of this study was to develop a GS release system using NRL as matrix forStaphylococcus aureusandEscherichia coliinfected skin ulcers treatment, without changing drug antibiotic properties. The matrix did not change the GS antimicrobial activity againstS. aureusandE. colistrains. Moreover, the NRL-GS biomembrane did not exhibit hemolytic activity, being non-toxic to red blood cells. The eluates of NRL-GS biomembranes and GS solutions did not significantly reduce the survival ofCaenorhabditis elegansworms for 24 h at any of the tested concentrations. Thus, these results emphasize that the NRL-GS biomembrane proved to be a promising biomaterial for future studies on the development of dressings for topical uses, inexpensive and practicable, keeping drug antibiotic properties against pathogens and to reduce the side effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据