4.7 Article

Experimental exploration of the waterproofing mechanism of inorganic sodium silicate-based concrete sealers

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 276-283

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.069

关键词

Concrete sealer; Sodium silicate; Water impermeability; Hydrophilic agent; Contact angle; Calcium silicate hydrate

资金

  1. Technical Center of China State Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. [00.000.072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The precise waterproofing mechanism for sodium silicate-based concrete sealers was experimentally explored using a Leeb hardness tester, a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, an X-ray diffraction microscopy, a thermal-gravimetric analysis, a surface area and porosity analyzer, a scanning electron microscope and an optical contact-measuring device. After treating the concrete surface with a sodium silicate-based concrete sealer, the new substance-sodium hydroxide-introduced into the concrete structure is undetectable most likely because of the quite low concentration and its migration to the concrete surface. The surface hardness of the concrete specimens impregnated with the sodium silicate-based concrete sealer is found to be increased by approximately 11.9% relative to the untreated concrete specimens. The content of the calcium hydroxide in the concrete structures decreases whereas the content of the calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H gel) in the concrete structures increases compared with the untreated concrete structures. Sodium silicate-based concrete sealers are essentially surface hydrophilic agents, yet they do reduce the velocity of water ingress into the concrete structures, because the expansive and insoluble C-S-H gels partially fill the micro-pores, micro-voids and micro cracks in the concrete structure to form smaller micro-pores, micro-voids and micro-cracks and improve the compactness and water impermeability of the concrete. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据