4.6 Article

Encapsulation ofRhodopseudomonas palustrisKTSSR54using beads from alginate/starch blends

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 138, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.50084

关键词

biopolymers; morphology; renewable polymers; rheology

资金

  1. Center of Excellence on Biodiversity (BDC), Office of Higher Education Commission [BDC-PG1-160002]
  2. Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blending alginate with starch to prepare hydrogels creates a more suitable matrix for cell entrapment, with starch helping beads retain their spherical shape and increasing cell encapsulation efficiency.
Alginate beads are a promising carrier for biofertilizer delivery, but still possess drawbacks of low mechanical strength and bead shrinkage that result in poor appearance and inadequate cell protection. Blending alginate with starch was proposed as a solution to these problems, and here alginate hydrogels were prepared using a 2% (w/v) alginate dispersion blended with varying contents of gelatinized starch (0-5% w/v). The interaction produced a viscosity synergism that increased the complexity of the matrix network in the alginate/starch blends, producing a more suitable matrix for cell entrapment. Hydrogen bonding between alginate and starch influenced the viscosity of the various solutions in a way that was consistent with the FTIR spectra. The starch content also helped beads retain their spherical shape after drying. The starch supported the entrapment of bacterial cells (plant growth-promoting bacteriumRhodopseudomonas palustrisKTSSR54 as biofertilizer) in the matrix, which reduced cell loss. The highest entrapment efficiency of 70.83% was obtained at 4% (w/v) starch, while the entrapment efficiency of control beads was 50.56%. Overall, the appropriate content of starch mixed with alginate is conducive to changes in the morphology of microcapsules and increases in the amount of biological encapsulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据