4.6 Article

Evaluation of hydrophilic cellulose nanofiber dispersions in a hydrophobic isotactic polypropylene composite

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 138, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.49896

关键词

composites; morphology; nanoparticles; nanowires; and nanocrystals; polyolefins; relationships; structure-property

资金

  1. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP16H02688, JP19H05721]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective approach using scattering and microscopic techniques was presented to evaluate the dispersion of hydrophilic cellulose nanofibers in hydrophobic isotactic polypropylene. Characterization of iPP composites reinforced with CNF fibrous fillers showed that the best dispersion results in the molten state coincided with low concentrations of CNFs. This study also observed the effect of CNFs on the acceleration of iPP crystal growth and the morphology around CNF fibrous fillers using different techniques such as wide-angle X-ray scattering and transmission electron microscopy.
An effective approach for the evaluation of dispersed hydrophilic cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) in hydrophobic isotactic polypropylene (iPP) is presented using scattering and microscopic techniques for fiber analysis on nanometer and micrometer scales. iPP composites reinforced with CNF fibrous fillers were characterized by small-angle light scattering, small-angle X-ray scattering, and polarized optical microscopy measurements in the molten state in order to evaluate the shape of CNF fillers and/or larger aggregates formed from these fibers. The best dispersion results in the molten state coincided with low concentrations of CNFs. We observed the effect of CNFs on the acceleration of iPP crystal growth using wide-angle X-ray scattering and differential scanning calorimeter measurements. It was even possible to observe the nucleation morphology around CNF fibrous fillers using transmission electron microscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据