4.6 Article

Thermo-responsive block copolymermicelle-supported(S)-α,α-diphenylprolinoltrimethylsilyl ether for asymmetric Michael addition of nitroalkenes and aldehydes in water

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 138, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.49831

关键词

catalysts; copolymers; micelles; thermal properties

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0201404]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21873051]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [17JCZDJC37300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An amphiphilic block copolymer was prepared through RAFT polymerization, and a chiral catalyst was immobilized onto the copolymer using CuAAC to form a micellar catalyst. This micellar catalyst showed high efficiency and selectivity in asymmetric Michael reactions in water and could be reused multiple times.
An amphiphilic block copolymer PNIPAM(53)-b-(PS30-co-P4AMS(10)) was facilely prepared by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. The immobilization of (S)-alpha,alpha-diphenylprolinol trimethylsilyl ether onto the block copolymers was then performed through using copper-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition (CuAAC), and the generating amphiphilic diblock copolymer supported chiral catalyst PNIPAM(53)-b-(PS30-co-P4AMS(10))/proTMS was self-assembled into micelles with regular diameters about 50 nm in aqueous solution. The micellar catalyst was further used for the asymmetric Michael reaction between propanal andtrans-beta-nitrostyrene in water. Using only 1 mol% micellar catalyst, the corresponding Michael addition products could be obtained in good yields and high enantioselectivities as well as good diastereoselectivities. In addition, this micellar catalyst could be reused at least for four times. Moreover, the micellar catalyst could be applied for the asymmetric addition reaction of 4-chlorocinnamyl aldehyde and nitromethane, and thus constructing the baclofen pharmaceutical intermediate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据