4.7 Article

Capillary water absorption in cracked and uncracked mortar - A comparison between experimental study and finite element analysis

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 154-162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.027

关键词

Capillary water absorption; Finite element analysis; Mortar; Cracks; X-ray radiography

资金

  1. SIM (Strategic Initiative Materials in Flanders)
  2. FWO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The durability and service life of concrete structures strongly depends on the transport of fluids through the cementitious material. These fluids can contain aggressive agents which causes degradation of the concrete matrix and corrosion of the steel reinforcement. In most cases the dominating mechanism for water ingress in cementitious materials is capillary absorption, especially when cracks are present. To be able to predict the durability of a concrete structure containing cracks, it is necessary to know the distribution of water and other aggressive agents inside the cementitious material. Capillary water entrance in uncracked and cracked mortar was simulated in this research by solving the 3D Richard's equation using Finite Element Method. Realistic boundary conditions, by considering the water evaporation process, were imposed in the model. The developed numerical model was validated by performing gravimetrical water absorption experiments and X-ray radiography on mortar specimens with one or multiple artificial cracks. This paper reports the validation of the numerical model through an experimental program. The numerical results agreed well with the experimental results in both the transient global water content and the transient water distribution for both uncracked and cracked mortar. Therefore, the imposed boundary conditions correctly describe the water uptake phenomenon. To be able to completely describe the durability of cementitious materials, the numerical model still has to be extended regarding the ingress of other substances like CO2 and chlorides. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据