4.5 Article

Metallurgical performance of innovative double-parameter oxygen lance in BOF steelmaking

期刊

IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 437-446

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03019233.2020.1806677

关键词

Double-parameter oxygen lance; converter; cavity size; mixing ability; splashing

资金

  1. Department of Education of Liaoning Province [2020LNQN12]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2017YFC0805100]
  3. Department of Science and Technology of Liaoning Province [2018307003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The metallurgical performance of a double-parameter oxygen lance in a 260 t converter was studied, focusing on the influence of nozzle arrangement on cavity size, mixing ability, and splashing capacity. Results showed that nozzle inclination affected cavity diameter while nozzle flow ratio impacted cavity depth. Increasing large-nozzle gas flow rate improved stirring strength but could result in increased splashing, highlighting the need for flow control to prevent steel splash.
The metallurgical performance of a double-parameter oxygen lance was characterized using the prototype of a 260 t converter. The influences of nozzle arrangement on the cavity size, mixing ability and splashing capacity were discussed. The results demonstrated that the small-nozzle inclination has a greater impact on the cavity diameter, while the large-nozzle flow ratio has a greater impact on the cavity depth. The influence of the large-nozzle gas flow rate on the stirring strength is greater than that of the nozzle inclination. The maximum splash flux is located at the outer edge of the large nozzle farthest from the axis of the lance. The large-nozzle flow of the double-parameter lance shall be limited to less than 65% of the total flow to prevent the molten steel from splashing out of the converter. Many metallurgical indexes were improved by the application of the double-parameter lance under commercial production conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据