4.5 Article

In situ polymerization of pyrrole on CNT/cotton multifunctional composite yarn for supercapacitors

期刊

IONICS
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 279-288

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-020-03784-2

关键词

CNT; cotton yarn; Supercapacitor; Nanocomposites; Conductivity; Electrochemical

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2019CFB290]
  2. Scientific Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education [Q20191701]
  3. Hubei Province Technical Innovation Special Project [2019AAA005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Yarn-shaped supercapacitors with CNTs and PPy embedded in cotton yarns with a ply twist structure exhibit excellent electrical conductivity, mechanical properties, high specific capacitance, and ideal cycle stability. The assembled supercapacitor shows good power density and energy density, presenting outstanding capacitive performance under different angles, providing new possibilities for 1D supercapacitors and flexible wearable electronics applications.
Yarn-shaped supercapacitors are favored due to their small size, high specific capacitance, and light weight. Herein, we reported a distinctive type of ply twist yarn supercapacitor by in situ polymerization of pyrrole on carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/cotton ring spun yarns. CNTs and polypyrrole (PPy) were successfully embedded into the cotton yarns with a ply twist structure. The as-developed electrode exhibited excellent electrical conductivity (20 omega/cm), good mechanical properties (59.8 MPa, 24.6%), a high specific capacitance of 386.5 mF/cm(2)with the current density of 1 mA/cm(2), and ideal cycle stability with the retention of 87.8% after 5000 cycles. Meanwhile, the assembled supercapacitor showed a power density of 278.4 mu W/cm(2)and an energy density of 13.21 mu Wh/cm(2). It also presented outstanding capacitive performance under different angles. This facile ply twist method provided new possibilities for one-dimensional (1D) supercapacitor and flexible wearable electronics applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据