4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of powder reuse on mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V produced through selective laser melting

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105273

关键词

Powder reuse; Powder recycling; Titanium; Additive manufacturing; Direct metal laser sintering

资金

  1. National Science Foundation's Graduate Research Fellowship Program [NSF SES-1449469]
  2. Air Force Research Laboratory [FA8650-12-2-7230]
  3. America Makes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metallic powder reuse presents attractive economic and environmental advantages for direct metal laser sintering (DMLS). However, continuous recycling of powder raises concerns of powder quality and sintered part performance, and complicates process validation. Efforts to examine the mechanical response of parts built with reused feedstocks are increasingly common in the technical literature, but none have optimized process parameters in DMLS to control for changes in material properties. In this paper, titanium powder reuse was investigated with the objective of optimizing the additive manufacturing (AM) process for reuse. Virgin Ti-6Al-4V powder was cycled a total of eight times through conditions representative of industrial DMLS machines. A full 2(3)-factorial design of experiments (DOE) approach was employed to identify how parameter settings affect mechanical behavior, and include reuse as a process variable. The independent factors (laser power, laser speed, and hatch distance) did not significantly affect mechanical properties; however, measurements of ductility were found to be influenced by some interaction between the factors. These results were attributed to the narrow operating envelope which was required for successfully sintered specimens. Density and chemistry measurements further demonstrated no significant change with respect to reuse. The findings suggest that titanium powder can be reused up to eight times without any noticeable loss in strength or ductility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据