4.4 Article

First-principles study of f-orbital-dependent band topology of topological rare earth hexaborides

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qua.26452

关键词

density functional theory; Dirac cone; HubbardUapproximation; rare earth; topological insulators

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [RG-1441-384]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of rare earth hexaboride (RE)B(6) series of compounds using first-principles approach, revealing their characteristics as topological insulators. The application of spin-orbit coupling also uncovered unique electron structures in certain cases.
The rare earth hexaboride (RE)B(6)series of compounds (RE = Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd) was investigated using the first-principles approach for exploring new topological insulators. The calculated structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of the materials are discussed in detail. To account for betterf-electron correlation, the Hubbard correction was also tested to correct the Kondo states. The lattice appeared contracted for materials from CeB(6)to GdB6, and charge is transferred from RE to boron. The inspection of band structure points tospdhybridization between RE-5dand B-2s,2pstates at Fermi level. The application of spin-orbit coupling revealed the conversion in the parity, and an odd number of Dirac cones is found at Gamma andXpoints without Kondo mechanism. PrB6, GdB6, and PmB(6)revealed a dispersive conic region near the Fermi level at high symmetry points, which enclosed Kramer's degenerate points with surface states of opposite parity. These materials prove to be a strong topological Kondo insulator with an SmB6-like cubic structure without involvement of f-orbitals in the formation of a Dirac cone. The HubbardUparameter determined from atomic calculation of REf-orbital, apart from the few cases whenf-states remain close to the Fermi level, revealed that the band structures are semimetallic in most cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据