4.6 Article

The impact of employee welfare on innovation performance: Evidence from China's manufacturing corporations

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107753

关键词

Manufacturing corporations; Innovation performance; Employee welfare; Mediating effect analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71671145, 71971191]
  2. Humanities and social science fund of ministry of education of China [17YJA790015, 17XJA790002, 18YJC790132, 18XJA790002]
  3. Science and technology innovation team of Yunnan provincial universities [2019014]
  4. Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects [202020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large amount of literature has addressed the significant effects of some internal and external factors on corporate innovation performance. However, no research in the field of production economics focuses on the plausible impact of employee welfare on innovation performance of manufacturing corporations. Using a large sample data from Chinese listed manufacturing corporations over the period of 2010-2017, this study investigates whether and how employee welfare affects corporate innovation performance. We find that manufacturing corporations with higher employee welfare have better innovation performances measured by three categories of patent applications and this positive relationship is mainly reflected in the level of quality of innovation but not in the quantity of it. Then, various robustness checks further show that our results are not biased by alternative measures of innovation performance or employee welfare through different regression methods. In addition, the channel tests show that the positive impacts of employee welfare on innovation performances in China's manufacturing corporations are mainly achieved by retaining outstanding employees, attracting positive media reports and increasing inventor (R&D) efficiency. Finally, we test the validity of three impact channels by using mediating effect analysis and further confirm our conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据