4.3 Article

Tenogenesis of bone marrow-, adipose-, and tendon-derived stem cells in a dynamic bioreactor

期刊

CONNECTIVE TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 454-465

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/03008207.2015.1117458

关键词

Bioreactor; differentiation; mesenchymal stem cells; regenerative medicine; tendon

资金

  1. James Madison University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tendons are frequently damaged and fail to regenerate, leading to pain, loss of function, and reduced quality of life. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) possess clinically useful tissue-regenerative properties and have been exploited for use in tendon tissue engineering and cell therapy. However, MSCs exhibit phenotypic heterogeneity based on the donor tissue used, and the efficacy of cell-based treatment modalities may be improved by optimizing cell source based on relative differentiation capacity. Equine MSCs were isolated from bone marrow (BM), adipose (AD), and tendon (TN), expanded in monolayer prior to seeding on decellularized tendon scaffolds (DTS), and cell-laden constructs were placed in a bioreactor designed to mimic the biophysical environment of the tendon. It was hypothesized that TN MSCs would differentiate toward a tendon cell phenotype better than BM and AD MSCs in response to a conditioning period involving cyclic mechanical stimulation for 1 hour per day at 3% strain and 0.33 Hz. All cell types integrated into DTS adopted an elongated morphology similar to tenocytes, expressed tendon marker genes, and improved tissue mechanical properties after 11 days. TN MSCs expressed the greatest levels of scleraxis, collagen type-I, and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein. Major histocompatibility class-II protein mRNA expression was not detected in any of the MSC types, suggesting low immunogenicity for allogeneic transplantation. The results suggest that TN MSCs are the ideal cell type for regenerative medicine therapies for tendinopathies, exhibiting the most mature tendon-like phenotype in vitro. When TN MSCs are unavailable, BM or AD MSCs may serve as robust alternatives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据