4.3 Article

Cyclic muscle twitch contraction inhibits immobilization-induced muscle contracture and fibrosis in rats

期刊

CONNECTIVE TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 5, 页码 487-495

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/03008207.2016.1257004

关键词

Cyclic muscle twitch contraction; hypoxia; immobilization; muscle fibrosis; transforming growth factor-beta 1

资金

  1. JSPS KAKEN from Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture (MEXT) [24700539]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K16427, 16K12937, 15H03045, 15K16356, 24700539] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effects of cyclic muscle twitch contraction caused by neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on immobilization-induced muscle contracture and fibrosis in rats. Twenty-nine rats were divided into control, immobilization, and immobilization with muscle contraction groups. The ankle joints of the immobilization and muscle contraction rats were fixed in full plantar flexion with a plaster cast for 4 weeks. In the muscle contraction group, cyclic muscle twitch contraction of the soleus muscle was induced using a commercial device (1 Hz, 4 +/- 2 mA, 60 min/day, 5 times/week) with the ankle joint immobilized. The dorsiflexion range of ankle joint motion in the muscle contraction group was significantly greater than that in the immobilization group. The expressions of fibrosis-related genes (i.e., hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha, transforming growth factor-beta 1, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and types I and III collagen) were significantly decreased in the muscle contraction group compared to the immobilization group. The fluorescence intensities of type I and type III collagen in the perimysium and endomysium in the muscle contraction group were significantly decreased compared to the immobilization group. These results suggest that cyclic muscle twitch contraction induced by NMES might alleviate skeletal muscle fibrosis, reducing immobilization-induced muscle contracture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据