4.7 Article

Comparable Effects of the Androgen Derivatives Danazol, Oxymetholone and Nandrolone on Telomerase Activity in Human Primary Hematopoietic Cells from Patients with Dyskeratosis Congenita

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197196

关键词

dyskeratosis congenita; androgen; danazol; telomerase; oxymetholone; nandrolone; telomeropathy; telomere

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dyskeratosis congenita (DKC) is a rare inherited disease of impaired telomere maintenance that progressively leads to multi-organ failure, including the bone marrow. By enhancing telomerase activity, androgen derivatives (ADs) are a potential therapeutic option able to re-elongate previously shortened telomeres. Danazol, oxymetholone, and nandrolone are ADs most frequently used to treat DKC. However, no direct in vitro analyses comparing the efficacy of these ADs have been conducted so far. We therefore treated mononuclear cells derived from peripheral blood and bone marrow of four patients with mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT, n = 1),in the telomerase RNA component (TERC, n = 2) and in dyskerin pseudouridine synthase 1 (DKC1, n = 1) and found no substantial differences in the activity of these three agents in patients with TERC/TERT mutations. All AD studied produced comparable improvements of proliferation rates as well as degrees of telomere elongation. Increased TERT expression levels were shown with danazol and oxymetholone. The beneficial effects of all ADs on proliferation of bone marrow progenitors could be reversed by tamoxifen, an estrogen antagonist abolishing estrogen receptor-mediated TERT expression, thereby underscoring the involvement of TERT in AD mechanism of action. In conclusion, no significant differences in the ability to functionally enhance telomerase activity could be observed for the three AD studied in vitro. Physicians therefore might choose treatment based on patients' individual co-morbidities, e.g., pre-existing liver disease and expected side-effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据