4.7 Article

Cataract-Associated New Mutants S175G/H181Q of βΒ2-Crystallin and P24S/S31G of γD-Crystallin Are Involved in Protein Aggregation by Structural Changes

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21186504

关键词

beta Beta 2-crystallin; gamma D-crystallin; cataract-associated mutants; proteomics dataset; hydrogen-deuterium exchange-MS; structural change; stability change; post translational modification; protein aggregation

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1F1A1055369, 2019M3E5D3073568]
  2. Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) - Korea government(MSIT) [2020-0-01373]
  3. Korea Basic Science Institute [C38524]
  4. Brain Korea 21 Plus (BK21 Plus) Project
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1F1A1055369, 2019M3E5D3073568] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta/gamma-Crystallins, the main structural protein in human lenses, have highly stable structure for keeping the lens transparent. Their mutations have been linked to cataracts. In this study, we identified 10 new mutations of beta/gamma-crystallins in lens proteomic dataset of cataract patients using bioinformatics tools. Of these, two double mutants, S175G/H181Q of beta Beta 2-crystallin and P24S/S31G of gamma D-crystallin, were found mutations occurred in the largest loop linking the distant beta-sheets in the Greek key motif. We selected these double mutants for identifying the properties of these mutations, employing biochemical assay, the identification of protein modifications with nanoUPLC-ESI-TOF tandem MS and examining their structural dynamics with hydrogen/deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry (HDX-MS). We found that both double mutations decrease protein stability and induce the aggregation of beta/gamma-crystallin, possibly causing cataracts. This finding suggests that both the double mutants can serve as biomarkers of cataracts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据