4.7 Article

Reducing atmospheric pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions of heavy duty trucks by substituting diesel with hydrogen in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei-Shandong region, China

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 34, 页码 18137-18152

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.132

关键词

Emission reduction; Hydrogen fuel; Fuel cycle assessment; Heavy duty trucks; The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei-Shandong region

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [FRF-TP-19005B1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extensive use of diesel heavy duty trucks in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei-Shandong region has led to significant atmospheric pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. By substituting hydrogen fuel cell heavy duty trucks for diesel trucks, there can be a substantial reduction in GHG and pollutant emissions, with the data showing a 25% contribution from the BTHS region in China.
The extensive use of diesel heavy duty trucks (diesel HDTs) has led to substantial atmospheric pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei-Shandong (BTHS) region, China. The substitution of hydrogen fuel cell heavy duty trucks (HFC-HDTs) for their diesel counterparts is effective to solve the problems above. Aiming at the BTHS region, a GPERF (GHG emission, Pollutant emission and Economic cost Reduction in Fuel cycle) assessment model was established combining with regional vehicle data to investigate the reductions of GHG emissions, pollutant emissions and economic expenditures by the substitution scheme. Data indicated that population of diesel HDTs and HFC-vehicles in BTHS region both accounted for reaching 25% of total in country. Results showed that the fuel substitution scheme could significantly reduce the GHG and pollutant emissions by vehicles in BTHS region, among which the GHG reduced by 1/3, while the NOx and PM remarkably reduced by around 50%. (c) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据