4.7 Article

Directly application of bimetallic 2D-MOF for advanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 416-424

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.182

关键词

Metal organic frameworks; Bimetal; Electrocatalysts; Oxygen evolution reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21663023]
  2. Double First Class General Science and Technology Projects from School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shihezi University [SHYL-YB201903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By optimizing the molar ratio of Ni to Co, a bimetal 2-methylimidazole based 2D-MOF with 5% Ni/Co molar ratio was synthesized, showing excellent activity and good stability in OER.
The development of non-noble oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts with low energy consumption and cost is imperative to produce hydrogen energy from water splitting and enlarge its application. Two-dimensional (2D) metal organic frameworks (MOF) and their derivatives are widely regarded as promising electrocatalysts (EC) for OER due to its unique structural characteristics. Here, by optimizing the molar ratio of Ni to Co, bimetal 2-methylimidazole based 2D-MOF is synthesized and its derivatives are also obtained by phosphorization or oxidation. OER measurements prove that the original MOF structure with 5% Ni/Co molar ratio shows excellent activity with 310 mV overpotential (eta) at the current density of 10 mA cm(-2) in 1 M KOH solution for OER, as well as a fairly good electrochemical stability rather than their oxidation or phosphorus derivatives. This work introduces a facile method to prepare bimetal imidazole-based 2D-MOF directly applied in energy conversion field without transformation, making a contribution for opening a new window of widely application of 2D-MOF and improving the hydrogen production efficiency from water splitting. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据