4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of laminar flow and heat transfer characteristics in square minichannels with twisted tapes

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119947

关键词

Heat transfer enhancement; Overall thermal performance; Minichannel; Twisted tape; Laminar flow

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21666005]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China [2017GXNSFEA198001, 2014GXNSFBA118051]
  3. Dean Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Resource Processing and Process Intensification Technology [2019Z012]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Guangxi University [XBZ190875]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flow and heat transfer characteristics of distilled water in a minichannel heat sink (MCHS) fitted with twisted tapes under laminar flow are investigated experimentally in present study. Nine twisted tapes with lengths of L-t = 50 mm, 100 mm and 150 mm, and twist ratios of Y = 3, 4, and 5 are employed as inserts. The results show that average heat transfer coefficient (h(ave)), pressure drop per unit length (Delta P-pul) and thermal enhancement factor (eta) increase with the decrease in twist ratio or/and the increase in twisted tape length. The heat transfer enhancement factor (h(ave)/h(ave),(0), where subscript 0 denotes plain MCHS) and the pressure drop increasing factor (Delta P-pul/Delta P-pul,P-0) are in the ranges of 1.29-2.49 and 1.68-4.72, respectively. The average values of eta for each MCHS with twisted tape are in a range of 1.09-1.46. The full-length (L-t = 150 mm) twisted tape with Y = 3 yields the best heat transfer rate, the highest flow resistance and the best overall thermal performance compared to other eight twisted tapes. In addition, the empirical correlations for h(ave) and Delta P-pul are developed based on the experimental results. The predicted h(ave) and Delta P-pul are within +/- 5% and +/- 6% deviation, respectively, compared to the experimental data. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据