4.5 Article

Letrozole versus clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in anovulatory women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A randomized controlled trial

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13375

关键词

Clomiphene citrate; Infertility; Letrozole; Ovulation induction; Polycystic ovarian syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In women with polycystic ovarian syndrome, letrozole may be a better option for ovulation induction compared to clomiphene citrate, as it results in higher pregnancy rates, shorter time to pregnancy, and lower chances of multiple pregnancies due to higher monofollicular development.
Objective To compare the efficacy of letrozole and clomiphene citrate (CC) for ovulation induction in infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Methods In this assessor blind, randomized controlled trial, 90 infertile women with PCOS were randomized to receive either letrozole or CC for ovulation induction in incremental doses for a maximum of three cycles. Main outcome measures studied were endometrial thickness, ovulation rate, pregnancy rate, rate of monofollicular development, and time to conception. Results Mean endometrial thicknesses were 9.86 +/- 2.32 mm and 9.39 +/- 2.06 mm with letrozole and CC, respectively (P=0.751). Cumulative ovulation rates were 86.7% and 85.2% with letrozole and CC, respectively (P=0.751). Pregnancy was achieved in 42.2% of women in the letrozole group and 20.0% of women in the CC group (P=0.04). Monofollicular development was seen in 68.4% of ovulatory cycles in the letrozole group compared with 44.8% in the CC group (P=0.000). Mean time to achieve pregnancy was significantly shorter (log rankP=0.042) with letrozole (9.65 weeks) than with CC (11.07 weeks). Conclusion Letrozole is a better alternative for ovulation induction in anovulatory women with PCOS as pregnancy rates are higher, time to pregnancy is shorter, and chances of multiple pregnancy are less because of high monofollicular growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据