4.5 Article

Physicochemical and physiological changes during the ripening of Banana (Musaceae) fruit grown in Colombia

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.14851

关键词

Climacteric fruit; colour; peel; plantain; respiration; ripening; soluble solids; starch

资金

  1. CGIAR Trust Fund
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1178942]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1178942] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the physicochemical and physiological attributes of three contrasting commercial varieties of bananas during post-harvest ripening. Significant differences were found in quality attributes among varieties, and starch levels decreased significantly during ripening, with different hydrolysis rates observed among the varieties. These results suggest potential parameters that may help improve current methods for monitoring ripening of bananas, particularly important for commercial varieties.
The physicochemical and physiological attributes of three contrasting commercial varieties of Musaceae, Dominico Harton (plantain), Guineo (cooking banana) and Gros Michel (dessert banana), were evaluated and statistically analysed during post-harvest ripening. Quality attributes differed markedly among varieties, both in fresh fruits and during ripening. Variety (V) had a significant effect (P < 0.001) on all attributes except total soluble solids (TSS), carotenes and total chlorophyll. Storage time (ST) had a significant effect on all attributes except colour parameter b* and total carotenes. Starch levels decreased significantly (P < 0.001) during ripening, with nearly complete hydrolysis in Gros Michel, followed by Guineo and Dominico Harton. Discriminant analysis showed that central diameter, TSS of the pulp, colour parameter a* and total starch had the highest weight in the differentiation among varieties. These results point out which parameters may help improve current methods for monitoring ripening of bananas, in particular the commercially important varieties in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据