4.5 Article

Spent caustic wastewater treatment using direct contact membrane distillation with electroblown styrene-acrylonitrile membrane

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-020-02972-x

关键词

Direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD); Styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN); COD removal; Electroblowing; Neutralized spent caustic

资金

  1. Pars Oil and Gas Company [972-96-35]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spent caustic wastewater was successfully treated using a novel approach involving neutralization followed by DCMD process with a SAN membrane. The SAN membrane showed stable permeate flux and rejection factor during 96 hours continuous testing, producing extremely pure permeate water. The overall performance of the DCMD process for treating spent caustic wastewater was highly effective.
Spent caustic is classified as a highly polluted and high-risk hazardous wastewater, which severely threatens the environment. In this work, a novel approach was proposed to treat the neutralized spent caustic wastewater using an electroblown nanofibrous styrene-acrylonitrile (SAN) membrane for direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD). The obtained results revealed that the permeate flux of the SAN membrane was lower compared to the commercial polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane owing to the thicker structure. The higher surface hydrophobicity of the SAN membrane limited the intrusion of the feed water into the membrane pores. Therefore, extremely pure permeate water was produced. Stable permeate flux (12.03 kg/m(2) h) and rejection factor (99.98%) were achieved for the hot-pressed SAN membrane during 96 h continuous DCMD test. Water contact angle of > 90 degrees was remained for both PTFE and SAN membranes, showing that DCMD performance was considerable even after 96 h operation. Besides, the chemical oxygen demand and sulfide removal factor for the fabricated membrane were 99.2 and 99.99%, respectively. Overall, the neutralization followed by the DCMD process can be considered as a proper alternative for treating the spent caustic wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据