4.7 Review

Review of operating condition, design parameters and material properties for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 1227-1245

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.5810

关键词

cell performance; design parameters; material properties; operating conditions; PEM fuel cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on the effects of parameters used in the design of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell revealed significant influences on the performance, particularly from operating conditions and material properties. Factors such as operating temperature and pressure were found to increase ionic conductivity and membrane degradation. Recommendations were made for the use of serpentine flow plates and membranes with high ionic conductivity.
Studies into the effects of parameters used in the design of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell have been done. All the modelling parameters considered influenced the performance of the PEM fuel cells. The effect of the operating condition is shown to be significant. Increasing the operating temperature and operating pressure increases the mobility of ions and as a result the ionic conductivity is increased. In addition, the membrane is dried out when the correct humidity is not provided which increases membrane degradation. Adopting good design parameter is necessary for the efficient transportation of both reactants (fuel and oxygen). With regards to the use of flow plates, the serpentine flow plate is highly recommended. Material properties are very important in material selection and new product development. For the membrane electrode area (MEA); the membrane, the ionic conductivity is very important and should be given an important consideration. This investigation thoroughly examined operating condition, design parameters and material properties necessary for PEM fuel cells experiment. The investigation will further accelerate the commercialization of fuel cells and its integration in the automotive industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据